Technical resources

RIC Data Monitoring & Verification

RIC monitoring guide

Use this guide to make the project discussion more precise.

RIC monitoring can support documented operation and help project teams review work-zone performance, but it does not replace project acceptance testing.

This guide separates useful process records from final ground acceptance.

Ask about this topic
RIC Data Monitoring & Verification

Guide contents

Questions a technical buyer should resolve before selection.

01

Data scope

Define what machine activity will be recorded and how it relates to work zones and construction sequence.

02

Acceptance ownership

Identify the project party, standard or specification that determines acceptance.

03

Record quality

Use consistent zone, point and time identifiers so records are traceable.

04

Evidence handover

Compile process records alongside required inspection and testing for the responsible decision.

CMG technical resource and equipment selection guide

Evidence boundary

A useful guide is clear about what it does not prove.

CMG uses this resource to organise a project conversation. It does not replace site investigation, geotechnical design, equipment documentation or the project acceptance specification.

  • Do not present monitoring data as automatic acceptance.
  • Do not use weak-zone records as a final engineering conclusion without project review.
  • Review missing or inconsistent records before handover.

Buyer checklist

Prepare these inputs before sending an RFQ.

  1. Project acceptance authority
  2. Work zones and monitoring points
  3. Required operating records
  4. Inspection or testing plan
  5. Reporting and handover format

Decision record

Turn the research question into a reviewable equipment brief.

Use the following record as a handover between procurement, site engineering and the equipment supplier. Empty fields are signals to investigate, not assumptions to fill with a generic machine claim.

01

Inputs to evidence

  • Project acceptance authority
  • Work zones and monitoring points
  • Required operating records
  • Inspection or testing plan
02

Decision to make

  • Data scope
  • Acceptance ownership
  • Record quality
03

Documents to request

  • Source-matched model specification and configuration
  • Operating and maintenance guidance for the quoted scope
  • Project-specific verification and handover requirements

Related equipment

Move from the question to a CMG equipment review.

CMG compaction equipment video centre

Video centre

Use video as context, not as unsupported proof.

Review available CMG equipment footage, then bring your project inputs to the technical discussion.

Visit the CMG video centre

Resource FAQ

Further questions for the project team.

Does RIC monitoring prove compaction acceptance?

Not unless the project specification defines that monitoring method as acceptance evidence.

What should be monitored?

Work zones, machine activity and any project-defined records that support the work history.

When should monitoring planning start?

Before mobilisation, so zones, records and acceptance ownership align.

How are weak zones handled?

They should be reviewed by the responsible project team and addressed through the project process.

Project RFQ

Tell us what the ground needs.

Share the project conditions and the CMG team can discuss a suitable equipment route.