Evidence review
Ask for model-specific data, drawings, test reports and other controlled documents related to the requested scope.
Factory evaluation guide
Use this guide to make the project discussion more precise.
Buyers evaluating an impact roller factory should focus on source-matched evidence, manufacturing scope, documentation and after-sales route.
This guide avoids using generic factory claims as a substitute for controlled documents.
Ask about this topic
Guide contents
Questions a technical buyer should resolve before selection.
Configuration scope
Clarify whether the supplier manufactures the roller, tow unit, damping arrangement and support equipment being quoted.
Quality information
Quality records should be tied to the model and configuration, not presented as a general certificate wall.
After-sales route
Plan spare parts, operating information, commissioning discussion and post-delivery communication.
Evidence boundary
A useful guide is clear about what it does not prove.
CMG uses this resource to organise a project conversation. It does not replace site investigation, geotechnical design, equipment documentation or the project acceptance specification.
- Do not accept a factory label as technical evidence.
- Do not assume all product images show the supplied scope.
- Confirm documents against the specific quotation.
Buyer checklist
Prepare these inputs before sending an RFQ.
- Model and configuration scope
- Source-matched technical data
- Requested controlled documents
- Manufacturing and inspection information
- After-sales and parts route
Decision record
Turn the research question into a reviewable equipment brief.
Use the following record as a handover between procurement, site engineering and the equipment supplier. Empty fields are signals to investigate, not assumptions to fill with a generic machine claim.
Inputs to evidence
- Model and configuration scope
- Source-matched technical data
- Requested controlled documents
- Manufacturing and inspection information
Decision to make
- Evidence review
- Configuration scope
- Quality information
Documents to request
- Source-matched model specification and configuration
- Operating and maintenance guidance for the quoted scope
- Project-specific verification and handover requirements
Related equipment
Move from the question to a CMG equipment review.
35kJ Impact Roller
High-energy polygonal roller for demanding subgrade and ground improvement projects.
Explore
32kJ Impact Roller
A high-energy impact roller for embankment, subgrade and foundation treatment.
Explore
30kJ Impact Roller
Balanced high-energy compaction for road base, fill and infrastructure construction.
Explore
Video centre
Use video as context, not as unsupported proof.
Review available CMG equipment footage, then bring your project inputs to the technical discussion.
Visit the CMG video centreResource FAQ
Further questions for the project team.
What should a factory evaluation include?
Model evidence, configuration scope, controlled documents and after-sales planning.
Does CMG publish generic factory claims?
No. Evidence is kept with the specific model and quotation scope.
Which documents should be requested?
Model data, drawings, inspection records and any controlled documents relevant to the quotation.
How should the evaluation conclude?
With a defined equipment scope, documentation set and project support route.